Majority versus proportionality?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract The study of electoral system reform is often focused on consolidated democracies. This special issue reforms in the Mediterranean region selects both democracies and moderate authoritarian systems. It analyses under aspects how they deal with dilemma between improving ‘governability’ by majoritarian instruments versus increasing proportionality representation. While governability also depends other factors, public debates are frequently structured along this dichotomy, which affects outcome process. focus reflects higher degree activities policy area (for instance compared to Nordic countries), helps drivers, scope, direction, vested interests reforms.
منابع مشابه
Expert rule versus majority rule under partial information, II
The main purpose of this paper is clarifying the connection between some characteristics of a deciding body and the probability of its making correct decisions. In our model a group of decision makers is required to select one of two alternatives. We assume the probabilities of the decision makers being correct are independent random variables distributed according to the same given distributio...
متن کاملLipoprotein-Cholesterol Fractions in Marginalized Roma versus Majority Population
The trend of modern clinical biochemistry is to emphasize the composition and the quality of lipoproteins over their quantity. The serum lipoprotein fractions and subfractions were analyzed by the Lipoprint Lipoprotein Subfractions Testing System, the parameters of lipid profile, as total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C)...
متن کاملForce Versus Majority: A Comparison in Convention Emergence Efficiency
In open societies such as multi-agent systems, it is important that coordination among the several actors is achieved efficiently. One economical way of capturing that aspiration is consensus: social conventions and lexicons are good examples of coordinating systems, where uniformity promotes shared expectations of behavior and shared meanings. We are particularly interested in consensus that i...
متن کاملEquality and Proportionality
Contemporary moral egalitarians hold that all people have equal moral standing and that we deserve this standing in virtue of satisfying some descriptive criterion. These two claims appear to be in tension, however, as none of the proposed criteria are attributes that all people possess equally. Many egalitarians have hoped to eliminate this tension by holding that the descriptive criterion of ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Zeitschrift für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1865-2646', '1865-2654']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-022-00548-2